Earlier this year, I asked the Secretary of the Department of Parliamentary Services numerous questions about his oversight of workers that help out at Parliament House. Despite earning $480,000 a year and only needing to attend Estimates three times a year, there was no explanation for the type of leave Stefanic was on that prevented him from fronting up to answer questions.
There are serious questions he needs to answer, and I’ll continue to ask these questions on behalf of former employees of Parliament House.
Transcript
Senator ROBERTS: Thank you for appearing here today. What is the nature of your boss’s leave?
Ms Hinchcliffe: In my opening statement I indicated we don’t comment on individuals’ leave arrangements.
Senator ROBERTS: Why not? I heard your opening statement.
Ms Hinchcliffe: They go to personal matters for individuals, so we wouldn’t comment on individuals’ leave arrangements.
Senator ROBERTS: Surely this is affecting the morale, which you want to turn around, of the DPS staff. As Senator Hume pointed out, the taxpayer is paying for it.
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’m not sure that it’s affecting morale of staff. I walk around the building and talk to our staff, and my sense of staff is that they are very committed to this building and are very committed to the work they do.
Senator ROBERTS: I agree, but many of come up to me and they’re not happy. They’re very dissatisfied with the way the department has been run. What is the nature of his leave?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’ve already indicated that we won’t be discussing—
Senator ROBERTS: We’ve heard that he’s being paid while he’s on leave. How long will he be on paid leave, noting that on Wednesday it will have been four weeks since he informed DPS staff he had gone on leave?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I indicated to an earlier question that I don’t have an end date for his leave.
Senator ROBERTS: Was Mr Stefanic’s decision to take leave on 9 October 2024 related to the National Anti-Corruption Commission’s raid on DPS in Parliament House on 3 October?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’ve indicated that I’m not speaking any further in relation to the execution of the warrants by the National Anti-Corruption Commission.
Senator ROBERTS: You’re aware it was specifically requested that Mr Stefanic be here to answer questions that he has personal knowledge of.
Ms Hinchcliffe: I wrote to the committee chair to indicate that he would not be available and to request that he be excused from this.
Senator ROBERTS: But you’re aware that he was specifically requested. I specifically requested him.
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’m aware now that you specifically requested. As I said, I went through the process, wrote to the chair and asked that he be excused.
Senator ROBERTS: Mr Stefanic has to appear at estimates only three times a year. He knew these hearings were coming up. He was formally requested and has failed to show up. How is this not contempt of the Senate?
Ms Hinchcliffe: As I already indicated in my evidence, I wrote to the chair and asked for him to be excused.
Senator ROBERTS: Do you feel like you’ve been thrown under the bus?
Ms Hinchcliffe: No, I do not.
Senator ROBERTS: Mr Stefanic has repeatedly said that complaints about DPS are purely due to former employees with an axe to grind. Do you share that view?
Ms Hinchcliffe: You may remember my evidence at the last hearing, where I said that I think that feedback is gold. We talked particularly about things like the staff survey and the importance of staff having the availability to provide to management their feedback on how they consider things are going but also where they’d like to see the department go into the future.
Senator ROBERTS: The employees of DPS that I hear from, especially security, are not at all happy. Do you know whether Mr Stefanic was in a relationship with Cate Saunders before or after he appointed her to the deputy secretary position?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I don’t have any knowledge about Mr Stefanic’s relationships, and I’m not willing to answer anything further on that. That’s not a matter for me.
Senator ROBERTS: I want to go to the case of ACD 13—it almost sounds like a rock group—in the Federal Court involving DPS. There’s a suppression order over that case except for hearings of parliament. I remind you that estimates is a hearing of parliament. I understand that the complainant, ACD 13, has consented to lifting that suppression order but DPS will not consent to lifting the suppression order. Is DPS resisting lifting that order?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I don’t have a lot of details on that matter, but as I understand it there’s currently a consultation underway. I can understand that our lawyers have been approached and that we’re going through
consultation processes at the moment, so that’s an ongoing matter which I won’t comment on any further.
Senator ROBERTS: Could you find out that the status is and give us an update on notice, please?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I will take that on notice.
Senator ROBERTS: What does DPS have to hide that you want to keep under suppression? What is it?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I have nothing to add in relation to that matter.
Senator ROBERTS: I understand Mr Robert Brigden instructed solicitors in ACD 13 that Rob Stefanic had ‘no involvement’ in intercepting a letter from a DPS employee. Is that what was instructed?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’m not aware of this matter in any detail. It occurred before I came to DPS. I don’t have anything I can add to that, sorry.
Senator ROBERTS: Is the statement that Rob Stefanic had no involvement in intercepting a letter from a DPS employee true?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I don’t have any knowledge of this matter to provide you with any further information.
Senator ROBERTS: Are you aware of the records of the first interview that took place with Barbara Deegan of Ashurst Lawyers?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’m not aware, no. I have no awareness of this matter.
Senator ROBERTS: My understanding is, in those records of the interview, contrary to the statement that he wasn’t involved, the facts show the contents of the envelope were taken and shown to Mr Stefanic and they were then kept in Mr Stefanic’s safe. Is that true?
Ms Hinchcliffe: As I just said, I don’t have any awareness of this matter. It occurred before I became to DPS.
Senator ROBERTS: Could you take on notice to find that out, please?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I can take it on notice.
Senator ROBERTS: Please take on notice to produce the transcripts of record of first interviews by Barbara Deegan from Ashurst with Andrew Brigden, Rob Stefanic and Cate Saunders. Note that the suppression order
from the Federal Court has a specific exemption for this hearing, so it does not apply to this request. Can you take that on notice, please?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’ll take that on notice.
Senator ROBERTS: Did Cate Saunders make any intervention to ensure that the statement that Rob Stefanic was not involved in the envelope interception was included?
Ms Hinchcliffe: As I said, I have no knowledge of this matter.
Senator ROBERTS: Could you take that on notice and find out, please?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’ll take it on notice, but whether I can find anything out is a different matter.
Senator ROBERTS: Perhaps you could check with the people involved that I’ve just named. Can you please confirm exactly when Cate Saunders began her employment?
Ms Hinchcliffe: Yes, I can. She was engaged with DPS on 17 December 2017.
Senator ROBERTS: How many branch or division managers have left their position over the last three years?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I would need to take that on notice.
Senator ROBERTS: That is understandable. Broadly, in relation to the NACC raid on raid on DPS of 3 October 24, have any DPS executives been stood down pending the NACC investigation and, if so, how many?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’ve already indicated that I won’t be speaking any further in relation to the NACC matters, but I can say that no senior executives have been stood down.
Senator ROBERTS: How many DPS executives are on paid leave while the investigation is underway?
Ms Hinchcliffe: Again, I’ve said that I’m not going to answer any other questions in relation to the—
Senator ROBERTS: This is in relation to your department, not the NACC.
Ms Hinchcliffe: No, you’re asking questions about people who might be on leave that go to whether or not they’re being investigated. At that point I need to consider whether or not that actually starts to go to a public
interest question, so I’ll take that on notice.
Senator ROBERTS: Could you take that on notice and, if you want to claim public indemnity, then it needs to go through the minister.
CHAIR: Public interest immunity.
Senator ROBERTS: Thank you—I get tangled up. Ms Hinchcliffe, when did you become aware that the NACC was investigating DPS?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I haven’t indicated what the NACC is investigating; I’ve indicated that the NACC has executed search warrants on DPS, and I’ve also indicated that I won’t answer any further questions.
Senator ROBERTS: When did you become aware of that investigation?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I have indicated that I won’t answer any further questions in relation to the investigation.
Senator ROBERTS: When did you become aware of the warrants?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I became aware that the NACC were going to issue warrants on DPS on 2 October.
Senator ROBERTS: Was that your first indication?
Ms Hinchcliffe: That the NACC was going to execute a warrant on 3 October? Yes, it was.
Senator ROBERTS: Thank you. Ms Hinchcliffe, during your time working at the Commonwealth Ombudsman’s Office, were you part of the team that dealt with the complaint about the handling of a Public
Interest Disclosure Act disclosure at DPS?
Ms Hinchcliffe: No, I was not.
Senator ROBERTS: When did you first work with Rob Stefanic?
Ms Hinchcliffe: When he started as secretary at DPS, and I think that was in the second half of 2015. It might have been in December.
Senator ROBERTS: So you were already there, and he came in as your boss?
Ms Hinchcliffe: That’s exactly right.
Senator ROBERTS: What year and date?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I think Mr Stefanic started in 2015. It was towards the end of the year; I started in April 2015.
Senator ROBERTS: So you preceded him by about six or seven months?
Ms Hinchcliffe: Yes, I think so.
Senator ROBERTS: Do you consider Rob Stefanic to be a personal friend?
Ms Hinchcliffe: I consider Mr Stefanic to be a colleague. He’s been somebody that I’ve worked with previously, and I’ve come and worked for him as the deputy secretary. I don’t have any outside engagement with
him, and I work with him as a colleague.
Senator ROBERTS: So you were there when he arrived? He arrived after you?
Ms Hinchcliffe: That’s right.
Senator ROBERTS: Did you work with him before that?
Ms Hinchcliffe: No.
Senator ROBERTS: Can you please take on notice to provide the total number of sexual harassment claims that DPS has settled over the previous five years and include the average settlement amount, the standard
deviation and how many of them have been under non-disclosure agreements?
Ms Hinchcliffe: Yes, I’ll take that notice.
Senator ROBERTS: Thank you. The upper management of DPS obviously has a lot of work to do to earn back the trust of DPS employees. We know that from just walking around the building. People come up to me
frequently. I would say to you that that work to restore trust starts with accountability and transparency. Surely, you could start the transparency with how you answer these questions and allow the suppression order to be lifted.
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’ll take that as a comment, Senator.
Senator ROBERTS: Well, will you lift the suppression order? I’d like that on notice.
Ms Hinchcliffe: I’ve already taken on notice of where that is up to, and I think that forms part of that question. If it’s not, if it’s a separate question, then I’ll take that on notice too.
Senator ROBERTS: Thank you. President, Minister—
The President: President.
Senator ROBERTS: President, thank you. Could I have your answer to that question as well please?
The President: What question?
Senator ROBERTS: I would say that trust starts with accountability. Could the suppression order be lifted?
The President: That’s got nothing to do with me, Senator Roberts.
Senator ROBERTS: Nothing at all?
The President: No. It’s a departmental matter.
Senator ROBERTS: Thanks, President. Thank you, Chair.
