Together we can achieve prosperity and peace. The globalists, the warmongers and the evil doers among us only seek to divide Australians. A united, caring country is their worst fear.
Transcript
I often end my speeches with the words, ‘We are one community, we are one nation,’ for a reason. Oneness is a fundamental teaching of Christianity. I quote I Corinthians 12:14:
For the body does not consist of one member but of many. If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body.
Verse 26 says:
If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, all rejoice together.
The Bible reminds us that a body of people working together can achieve that which people divided never will.
One Nation will continue to embrace all who share this beautiful land. One Nation embraces First Australians, and we embrace those who have come since. All are important. All make each of us greater than we could ever become by ourselves. Indeed, all have made us greater than we once were.
As a community, we do face evil. That battle is as old as time itself. That’s why humanity has evolved to consider community the basic building block of safety and prosperity. Those who seek to divide do so because they seek to destroy. Instead, together we can overcome the ravages of Mother Nature in a harsh but bountiful land. Together we can achieve abundance for all Australians. Surely, if our bounty is not being shared fairly, we must correct that. Together we can defeat predatory billionaires who believe they should own everything and we should own nothing. Together we can change the lives of First Australians in remote communities who deal with conditions that, today, no human being should ever have to. We can and must start on that today.
Evil is fought together, not apart. One Nation will continue to hold our hand out to those captured by intolerance and hate. I live in hope that one day our hand will be taken. In the end, love and courage will win. Most Australians feel the same way.
Re: The Aboriginal Voice, Treaty and Sovereignty versus a United Nation
There is no place in Australia for discrimination based on race or culture. I seek your action in ensuring the Australian Constitution is not changed as intended by the Labour Government to give Aborigines a Constitutionally enshrined voice to Parliament.
I wish to draw your attention to the slippery slope upon which the discussion about Aboriginal empowerment is being conducted. Unfortunately, studies of Aborigines are mired in ‘political correctness’. Like the too common belief that Aboriginal culture is laudable instead of otherwise, ‘if you say it often enough, people come to believe it’. Hence, we hear the Leader of the Opposition, Peter Dutton MP, asking for elaboration from the PM about what form the Voice will take. What Australians need to hear is that there must never be an Aboriginal Voice enshrined in the Constitution regardless of its wording. The Constitution must never contain wording that would permit racial or cultural division or discrimination within Australian society, especially in any way that an activist court could choose to reinterpret.
The public overwhelmingly has been and is being bombarded with only one side of the discussion; that an Aboriginal Voice must be enshrined in the Constitution, that a Treaty or Treaties must be struck between Aborigines and the Government or governments of Australia, and that Aboriginal Sovereignty must be recognized. When will we be told about the other side of the argument?
The Voice proposal overseen by Aborigines in 2020 sought public submissions but had to be extended in time so that the overseers could lobby their brethren to obtain the better total response of 9,400 submissions. 9,400 submissions cannot be seen as revealing the wants of the more than 700,000 people who claim Aboriginality in Australia.
Captain Cook led an expedition from England and landed in Australia during 1770. At this time in Australia, there were approximately 750,000 aborigines living in about 684 separate language groups spread across Australia. Each group had its own language, customs, and culture. Even adjoining groups often could not understand the language of their neighbours. Aborigines had no concept of nationhood in the sense that countries are seen to be nations today. There was never an aboriginal nation, and to say there was is to speak nonsense and maleficently. On 3 June 1992, the High Court of Australia recognised that a group of Torres Strait Islanders, led by Eddie Mabo, held ownership of Mer (Murray Island). This was in accordance with international law because the Meriam people tilled the land. However, in acknowledging the traditional rights of the Meriam people to their land in that particular case, the Court also held that native title existed for all Indigenous people in Australia. This was an activist ruling that contradicted international law at the time of settlement. Under international law at the time of settlement the Aborigine had no title rights to land because they were a hunter/gather people, not agriculturalists. The Court decided that if some form of title were to be given, then the law had to be given an interpretation not intended when the law was written; and it made new law accordingly. It is this ruling that has led to Aboriginal activism with its claims of land ownership, nationhood, and sovereignty.
Aboriginal discrimination and apartheid exist already in Australia; discrimination against non-Aborigines, enforced by Aborigines. Many roads and places in Australia require Aboriginal permits to use or enter. Access to many remote Aboriginal settlements is forbidden; little wonder that those communities are dysfunctional, as I have seen many times in my travels around Australia. If the Aboriginal Voice, Treaty and Sovereignty come to be then Australian society and its institutions will forever be divided. The time is now, when the Australian people need to see politicians with conviction, conviction in ensuring Australian society is ruled by a Constitution and policies that treat everybody equally according to race or culture, without discrimination in any form.
Interesting that Senator Roberts begins this talk with a couple Bible quotes. Perhaps there should be more of that. That same Bible also says that the stranger is to be treated the same as, let’s say, all citizens. One law for all, one voice for all, no matter who they are. However, Australia has strayed far from Biblical precepts which were once the bedrock of the nation. This isn’t surprising as all the nations that were once part of Christendom have all done likewise and now are doing what they think is right in their own eyes. This will lead to disastrous results, as it did in ancient Israel, which resulted in the wrath of God being poured out. History will repeat itself!
History surely repeats itself, although mainly through societies which eventually fail.
Take for instance the Roman Empire and many more which reached a peak then the rot set in and these civilisations destroyed themselves.
America is sadly on the decline and Australia is following because the family unit is being destroyed, moral values are in decline, most people now believe that the world owes them a living and therefore vote for politicians who will give the biggest handout, respect for authority and elders sees the youth of today out of control.
Any discipline is thought to lead to self discipline and consequences of a persons actions are no longer held to be that persons own responsibility; which through excuses for their bringing up, drug use, childhood abuse or neglect and peer pressure see them receiving a slap on the wrist for major crimes.
Then when someone ends up incarcerated in jail the bleeding hearts believe any reaction for their disregard for authority is a punishment which only makes them more bitter when the are eventually released. Better to give them more pizza than take away any privileges – hence they do not learn what consequences really are..