Canberra Health Autocrats have decided there is no place for religion in health care and are trying to take over the Calvary Hospital. It seems nobody is going to get in the way of the Health Autocrats’ agenda to murder babies and murder our elderly.
Transcript
There is trouble in Pan-em from Hunger Games. Or ‘Canberra’ as some still call it.
Australian Capital Territory Health Autocrats have decided there’s no place for religion in health care and are trying to take over the Calvary Hospital.
Legislation to seize the hospital from the Catholic Church has been presented to the ACT Parliament.
Legislation developed over a long period of time. In fact, this is the second attempt ACT Health Autocrats have made to steal the Calvary Hospital.
Nothing irks autocrats more than an organisation that refuses to buckle to their heathen agenda.
The ACT has legislated abortion and euthanasia. The Catholic Church insists on putting humanity around those rules, which has inflamed the ACT autocrats.
Nobody’s going to get in the way of the Health Autocrats’ agenda to murder babies and murder our elderly.
There are 14 Calvary Hospitals in Australia delivering health services in a faith-based environment, healing millions of Australians since their start in 1885.
Churches around Australia provide hundreds of aged care homes.
Each of these must be looking over their shoulder at what the Canberra Health Autocrats are trying to do at Calvary.
I urge all members of the ACT Parliament to reconsider this evil act.
If not this will go to the Federal Parliament which has precedence over ACT law.
If ever there was a time to use our power of veto it’s now.
The Federal Parliament must send a message to these autocrats and their heathen agenda.
And the message is this:
God decides who lives and dies, not you.
Thank you.
Let’s hope respect for lives and quality of care is allowed to flourish.
All the best Calvary Hospital.
Just more of the WHO attempting to decimate the world population.
God has taken His hand off & left Australia to learn for itself who we really are. Even so, when we rebel against God Himself, there are self-created consequences and they are never good. Just as well God always loves us before we ever loved Him
This attack on Christianity, pushed by WEF, WHO is attack on all humanity itself.
Remember the Christian Crusades. They’re coming back. Calvary Hospital Australia was built on Judeo-Christian ideology and it will remain that way.
Once again this stupid government of Labor is in take over of another one of our popular hospitals, they give good service and look after patients 100% which this stupid government would not know how to do. They are one Bldy Big Mess and so broke as could not scratch their own big toe if they tried, I never voted for these fools and would never even consider them as anything excepr sewer rats.
Thank you, Senator Roberts, for standing up for the defenceless – the unborn and the elderly – against those who love death so much (for others, not themselves). May God bless you.
The take over of Calvary Hospital in Canberra looks like it will go ahead. I cannot believe this is happening in a democratic country – this is Communism. The staff found out on social media about a takeover and Barr (Chief Minister) is pushing for the takeover early July. He is not allowing Calvary anytime to get legal representation. What is happening in this country its things like this that happen in other communist countries not here..
Chief Minister Barr just couldn’t leave the Calvary Hospital alone as they wouldn’t have agreed to abort (murder)babies. Barr announced recently he was allowing free abortion in the ACT. We have had to put up with all his rainbow stuff as that’s his community but to murder the unborn he has gone too far. How long do we have to suffer these evil, lying Labor Governments.
Dear Malcolm, Staff and Contributors,
November last year (2022) I brought to Malcolm’s attention a CSIRO publication for him to read.
TITLE “State of the Climate 2022”
I even made the offer to discuss any matters he wished to raise after reading the said publication.
I received no reply except to be placed on the mailing list to this website.
Taking up the invitation to contribute I started posting some comments.
I endeavoured to keep my comments polite, to the point and confined to the topics where I felt I could make some contribution to yours and your reader’s general knowledge.
There are many cases where the information provided by this website is at significant variance from general scientific knowledge and from what can be found on the internet.
In the interest of accuracy and understanding I attempted to bring these departures to the attention of all.
Stating (several times) my willingness to change my viewpoint in the light of scientific evidence I asked questions for any person to answer.
I have received only one (partially complete) answer to these questions.
I have even provided links to websites where related information could be found.
My main concern is the level of censorship applied to my inquiries.
Even replies, by others, to some of my postings were also deleted.
Requests for explanation of the censorship have been denied.
I do not expect to make any significant progress with this complaint as I am not in control of the website.
All I can do, in the hope of receiving meaningful answers, is to continue asking for clarification on contested areas.
NOTE
Examples of these allegations can be supplied if requested.
Cheers,
Col
Hi Col, I hear you with your concerns. Unfortunately, today, anything that is posted on the internet is censored. Marxism & Communism reigns because it is let reign. So many are selling their souls for 30 pieces of silver as they have no conscience to stand up & stand against the minority who are being allowed to become a majority. Get guts. Our diggers went out to protect this country & it is being handed over. What did they die for??
Hi Rita, Thanks for your reply.
My comments are basically in defence of scientific thought, knowledge and understanding.
They have nothing to do with Communism and Marxism.
I am concerned that scientific objectivity is not permitted on this website.
Many postings on this site are at variance to accepted scientific and easily found factual information.
Many of my challenges to these postings are deleted within a day or so.
Is one not allowed to bring to the attention of those in control (of this website) challenges re, Global Warming, the Greenhouse Effect , Vaccine efficacy and Government decisions based on an understanding of factual information etc.?
The effect of these deletions is that readers of this site are being denied crucial information related to the brief list of topics above.
Those in control appear to have their own agenda and are totally unprepared to openly discuss any contrary concepts.
Unfortunately, some replies to the postings on this website seem to fully support the concepts of these webmasters
In short, I would like to see this website open to free and polite discussion that can be defended by careful and intelligent thought.
This means some people would have to accept their ideas are incorrect (I am prepared to change my views if convincing arguments are presented).
This submission may be present until 09:30 Tuesday 13 June 2023
Cheers,
Col
Hi Rita, Thanks for your reply.
My comments are basically in defence of scientific thought, knowledge and understanding.
They have nothing to do with Communism and Marxism.
I am concerned that scientific objectivity is not permitted on this website.
Many postings on this site are at variance to accepted scientific and easily found factual information.
Many of my challenges to these postings are deleted within a day or so.
Is one not allowed to bring to the attention of those in control (of this website) challenges re, Global Warming, the Greenhouse Effect , Vaccine efficacy and Government decisions based on an understanding of factual information etc.?
The effect of these deletions is that readers of this site are being denied crucial information related to the brief list of topics above.
Those in control appear to have their own agenda and are totally unprepared to openly discuss any contrary concepts.
Unfortunately, some replies to the postings on this website seem to fully support the concepts of these webmasters
In short, I would like to see this website open to free and polite discussion that can be defended by careful and intelligent thought.
This means some people would have to accept their ideas are incorrect (I am prepared to change my views if convincing arguments are presented).
This submission may be present until 09:30 Tuesday 13 June 2023
Cheers,
Col
Malcolm
After reading this article a thoughtful and caring person cannot help but be appalled by the lack of information and the rabble rousing prose employed.
Did one of your staff members write the article or were you the author?
In any case by having your name attached can it be assumed the article has your approval.
Abortion
Not a comfortable thought but what about the pregnant woman in the situation?
The reasons for seeking an abortion are varied and of deep concern.
They have available a wide range of counsellling support from trained personnel.
Even so a considerable amount of trauma must be endured psychologically, emotionally and medically.
To be further confronted by the accusation as a murderess without any compassion can only add to the trauma already experienced.
Euthanasia
In these cases the patient making the request must be of sound mind,
They are facing a reduced life expectancy due to medical complications.
Several specially trained doctors must assess the patient regarding their life expectancy and life quality.
Trained personnel will be on hand to provide counsellling as required by the patient and family.
Imagine the patient and family facing the prospect of extended discomfort, incapacitation and most likely incontinence knowing there can be no recovery.
In these cases.
Who has the “right” to insist their own personal, religious, moral or political convictions take precedence over the rights of the patients?
Where these services are available a high level of political and legal discussion has already taken place to avoid the possibility of misuse or “murder” as alleged.
Surely, One Nation as a political party is not going to allow itself to descend to the poorly informed rabble rousing uncaring disregard of personal and family trauma for party and political gain.
Cheers,
Col