DEBUNKED: Brian Cox & Senator Malcolm Roberts on QandA

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Join me as I break down the famous QandA session from 2016 with Brian Cox.

Have my arguments stood the test of time? Have the warnings of certain disaster by 2024 come true?

I go into depth to explain the full story behind this exchange that captured millions of views.

/4 Comments/by
You might also like
Same place, same time, different temperatures. What’s the BOM hiding? Prime Minister backstabs the people who voted for him
The True Causes of Coral Bleaching The True Causes of Coral Bleaching
Wind turbines are environmental vandals Wind turbines are environmental vandals
Reckless Renewables! Reckless Renewables!
Humans Not Responsible for Increases in CO2 Humans Not Responsible for Increases in CO2
Same place, same time, different temperatures. What’s the BOM hiding? Same place, same time, different temperatures. What’s the BOM hiding?
4 replies
  1. james
    james says:

    Hi Malcolm!
    and thanks for all that you do.
    Watching this QandA review, was reminded of how, at the time when it was first broadcast, my perspective on the topic -and of you- was leaning towards the Thun-Camp. I was sucked in! (altho’, it must be said, was caring for a demented and dying Mater and, consequently, somewhat distracted in general).
    My study, knowledge and opinion have all grown considerably since then!!
    Anyway, the main thing is, ‘Have you seen this?’ : https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7418/4/3/17

    Thanks, again to you and ‘the team’ – y’ know where my vote is to be placed later in the month!
    Sincerely,
    j.

  2. Gumnut 123
    Gumnut 123 says:

    Politicans are NOT tghere merely to mimplement “the experts” reports,

    You Senator are doing exatly what a Politician should do and that is garner all the knowledge and ask questions and discuss …

    Barents sea islands had cold weather trees eg Chestnuts etc., growing millions of years ago – proven by Scientists drilling and examining the cores.

    WHY did the Dinosuars die?

    Senatror, I do hope that Australians listen to your video here, to hopefully make them think and exanine matters.

    Australia is fortunate to have you in the Federal Parliament of Australia.

  3. Gumnut 123
    Gumnut 123 says:

    Politicans are NOT here merely to implement “the experts” reports. as one of the guests on this show suggested, What a staged show.

    You Senator are doing exatly what a Politician should do and that is garner all the knowledge and ask questions and discuss …

    Barents sea islands had cold weather trees eg Chestnuts etc., growing millions of years ago – proven by Scientists drilling and examining the cores.

    WHY did the Dinosuars die?

    Senatror, I do hope that Australians listen to your video here, to hopefully make them think and exanine matters.

    Australia is fortunate to have you in the Federal Parliament of Australia.

  4. Bob Close
    Bob Close says:

    Thank you once again Malcolm for your forensic analysis of this historic semi debate on climate science. Actually, Tony Jones did a good job allowing you to answer and ask pertinent questions, a rare event on Q&A.
    Clearly Simon Cox using the authority of his Astronomy position and his undoubted political acumen, expected you to wither under his onslaught of continual misdirection using false data and hiding behind the eminence of NASA achievements that were irrelevant to the question in hand on data manipulation and false testimony. But you stuck to your guns and then he had to bring out his trump card- the models, which then played into your hand.as you and I know they are GIGO, totally subjective and wrong when using AGW to provide ECS values greater than 1-2C. As noted in my climate eBook, Scafetta (2022, 2024) studying recent GCMs showed “the performance of the models seems to increase as the ECS decreases”, so the lower ECS models are more viable. Thus, whilst the models are not validated they approach observations more closely when CO2 is only a limited factor and water vapour has a stronger moderating influence on temperature.
    Most people believe that models are real science, so get carried away by their predictions, whereas we real scientists know only observations and historical research data can be used to infer trends and possible predictions, all of which are benign in relation to global temperatures over the next century. Many solar experts believe that the coming solar grand minima after the current solar cycle 25 will provide cooling of up to 0.5C before 2032, if this is the case with ongoing rising CO2 we will have established that AGW is invalid- end of story for the global warming scam!

Comments are closed.