SOCIAL MEDIA
Latest posts from Malcolm’s Facebook and Twitter
Calling all kiwis in Australia
I support efforts in Australia & overseas to end the UN World Health Organisation’s tyranny and the WHO's attempts at future tyranny
In 2016 I called for Australia to exit the UN, AusEXIT. I continue that call
In 2020 I called for Australia to exit the UN-WHO. I continue that call
Our kiwi mates across the “dutch” sent me the following information:
In late 2024 the New Zealand Parliament approved the “Exit the WHO Referendum Petition”.
Last week the website went live, senroberts.com/3WfU6ha & includes a White Paper
NZ’s referendum petition rules require 400,000 wet ink signatures from Kiwis on the New Zealand Electoral Roll by 25 November 2025 in order to call a referendum on NZ withdrawing from the UN-WHO
Signatures are only allowed on the approved form
Maximum allowed expenditure is $50,000.
Many kiwis live here in Australia so the kiwi organisers have asked me to assist us spreading news of the petition
This kiwi petition for a referendum is a citizen’s initiated referendum
One Nation policy for many years calls on Australia to adopt citizen’s initiated referendums as a way of giving citizens’ authority over politicians & holding politicians accountable
I support moves to stop UN-WHO tyranny. We need to withdraw from the corrupt, incompetent, inhuman, anti-human UN-WHO
Let's help our kiwi mates. Please share this with as many kiwis as possible
... See MoreSee Less
- Likes: 162
- Shares: 86
- Comments: 21
Thanks for putting this out there. As nurses and clinicians we are aware of the importance of maintaining care closer to home and being in charge of what happens in our own back yard!
What about the same for Australia
Thank you Senator Malcolm Roberts I am a kiwi in New Zealand and I find this the weirdest thing ever to have to have "wet ink" signatures only or it WILL NOT BE COUNTED. So online typed signatures won't be counted. I do not know of any others where this is needed. Another ploy to put people off!! Thank you for sharing! I am FULLY AWAKE TO EVERYTHING.
I’m praying this will stop and get our freedom back. As we are the people, we are living beings, living women and men. We all know the government taxes are the biggest scam in history. We were their beneficiaries, and we have the power to stop them from controlling our country’s economic future wealth; we don’t consent and have no contract and no justification under common laws, especially when anyone gets a guilty verdict in court. Use the straw man to your advantage, not forgetting our birth certificate bond. STRAWMAN IS A LEGAL FICTION. With the government, especially the judges and lawyers, they’re only trustees, but we tell them what to do as we are the beneficiaries. In school, they don’t want our children to be educated; they don’t want us to think too much. That’s why our countries and our world have become so proliferated with entertainment, mass media, game shows, television shows, amusement parks, drugs, alcohol, and every kinda of entertainment to keep human mind entertained so that you don’t get in the way of important people, by doing too much thinking we better wake up and understand that they are the people who guiding our life and we don’t even know it. And all Australian 🇦🇺, New Zealand 🇳🇿, American 🇺🇸 countries and around the world citizens I think have suspected something like this going on, but we’re all too busy trying to stay alive and live our lives and after all, WHAT CAN ONE PERSON DO ABOUT IT? WE ARE BEING DISTRACTED BY ENTERTAINMENT
I would still like to know who OWNS Ahpra. Because it is not commonwealth owned. Nor is it state owned.or accountable
Should have got out years ago
So How can we Start one of these here .
This is the only way forward to protect the people is to outs WHO and their fear mongering propaganda. Nothing but a waste of tax payers money for jack shit.
Yes indeed Malcom!
So where’s all the clever people in this country to do something like that. Commonwealth Custodian and all the other know it alls spruiking about the Australian Constitution 1901
Senator Malcolm Roberts 100% yes, our treasonous grubernment has tried to hide the fact that this is our right.
Can we do the same with foreign (military) aid and illegal wars? What about bailouts of financial institutions that come back to steal billions of us??
Shared to all the groups that I can think of,also I wrote to the Clarence Valley Independent Newspaper.https://clarencevalleynews.com.au/coming-for-your-freedom-of-speech/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0Rz9x49YT_APukLNhUCCKCi2fyuTbtb3XPvzOUGCr8DWCktYmMeYBtoow_aem_MDfcOzQ-cXG_JWUiZ6fo0w
Stand Up Australia
We must not exit the WHO we ahould get it disbanded for the sake of humanity. This us a great watch and people need to share this far and wide.
Exit NOW!
You’re a legend! I can help, there are a million kiwis out here in the mining industry of WA who would be happy to sign the referendum petition!!
When can we get this happening here? Can’t come soon enough.
Mars Lum
During the recent estimates, I raised several questions regarding the approval and use of mRNA vaccines by the Australian Pesticides And Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). I inquired if the APVMA has authorised any mRNA vaccines. Mr Hansen confirmed that, as of now, no such vaccines have been approved. To ensure thoroughness, Dr Maria Trainer, joined the discussion. She reiterated that no permits or authorisations for mRNA vaccines have been issued, although she stated that there is a general permit for small-scale research (Permit 7250) that might cover such activities.
I questioned whether the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries had acted with APVMA's consent in importing, testing, and manufacturing an mRNA vaccine for border disease. Dr Trainer clarified that while no specific permits were issued, research could legally occur under the general permit. For clarity, I asked for confirmation on whether the Elizabeth Macarthur Institute holds such a permit and was told that this would be provided to us on notice.
I also addressed concerns about the development of mRNA vaccines for lumpy skin disease and foot-and-mouth disease by the Elizabeth Macarthur Institute. Dr Trainer confirmed that no applications for these vaccines have been received, with Mr Hansen adding that notifications about genetic material for vaccines would likely fall under the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) and Biosecurity.
Lastly, I raised the issue of foot rot vaccines for sheep, noting that an overseas manufacturer has been approved while an Australian manufacturer has had its approval withdrawn. The overseas vaccine is more expensive and less effective.
I urged the government to commit to a process that ensures the availability of the more effective and affordable Australian-made vaccine for our sheep farmers. Senator Chisholm agreed to take this on notice, and Mr Hansen expressed openness to discussions with the Australian manufacturer for product registration.
... See MoreSee Less
Keep up the good work Senator
You are a good man Malcolm. You truly represent most Australians . Bless you.
Senator Malcolm Roberts Exposé: Human Rights Commission Lawyer Facing Criminal Charges From the middle of 2024, after observing how the Human Rights Commission and other regulatory bodies responded to complaints from vulnerable individuals, I decided with colleagues to turn this into a journalistic exposé. This was never about receiving $40 million or seeking resolution through corrupt avenues—that was the bait. The real goal was to investigate the investigators, to document how far the system would go to deflect, mock, and avoid accountability, not just for disability pensioners but for the broader Australian population. While those in positions meant to protect the public believed they were playing their usual games, they were, in fact, feeding my collection of their own failures, and shaming themselves with juvenile attempts to mock and strip me of my rights. The violations I’ve endured are real, and so is my unwavering intention to inform the public of these injustices in whatever creative way I choose. Exposé of the Human Rights Commissions of Australia: A Systemic Failure in Protecting Human Rights My story began in late 2022 when, during a medical marijuana consultation, I was told by a doctor that I could be arrested if I didn’t use a vaporiser. This shocking assertion opened the door to what would become a journey of systemic failure, gaslighting, and outright mocking from multiple regulatory bodies and human rights organisations. What followed was a consistent pattern of informed consent violations, failure to log complaints, deflections, and dismissals from institutions such as the TGA, OHO, OQO, and the Human Rights Commission. These violations, along with the dismissal of my concerns, ultimately led to a medical marijuana dispensary stripping me of my medication for questioning their informed consent practices. This left me to face a system that has not only harmed, abused and mocked myself, but countless others. The Human Rights Commission’s Queensland Advocacy and Inclusion (QAI) group, led by human rights lawyer Mary Burgess, played a central role in this debacle. After contacting the QAI and speaking directly with Burgess about the coercion, informed consent violations, and threats of possible arrest I had faced, I received a response that was nothing short of astounding, but not surprising. Burgess completely ignored the core issue of informed consent, choosing instead to suggest I change doctors and imply that my prescribed medication was too strong—an absurd stance for a human rights lawyer to take, offering medical advice instead of investigating clear violations of informed consent. Her actions revealed her true role—not as an advocate for human rights, but as a tool of the system, working to protect the status quo at the expense of those she was meant to defend. What followed was a complete breakdown of what a human rights lawyer’s responsibilities should be. Burgess’s deflections and failures to investigate or log my complaints laid bare the systemic rot within the Human Rights Commission. The duties of a human rights lawyer—protecting the vulnerable, advocating for justice, and holding systems accountable—were utterly abandoned. Her role became not one of justice but of complicity, shielding the very system that had violated me. Recognizing this, I began systematically correlating and baiting the institutions with my real complaints in the middle of 2024 to prove they would ignore anything that mentioned informed consent or violations by doctors and medical dispensaries. The failures of every institution involved, from regulatory boards to the Human Rights Commission itself, were carefully documented. I understood early on that each letter of deflection and every piece of bureaucratic red tape was another nail in the coffin of those who believed themselves untouchable. Their arrogance blinded them to the fact that their responses were feeding my case, providing all the evidence I needed to incriminate them. From the outset, my complaints to the TGA, OHO, and OQO were met with predictable scripts. After the first two dismissals, it became clear their playbook relied on deflecting blame and gaslighting me with responses like “your marijuana is too strong” or “you need to change doctors.” These tactics only emboldened me to push further, knowing they would expose their failures with every reply. At every step, their deflections only strengthened my case, including one instance where an OHO officer smugly responded, “I understand that vaporisers can explode, but the doctor has done nothing wrong.” When I called to ask why he ignored the informed consent violations, he repeatedly said to “put in a complaint about me,” fully aware it would perpetuate the cycle of disregarding human rights. Mary Burgess, a lawyer with the Human Rights Commission, proved no different. Following our initial phone call, her written response in 2023 was dismissive and evasive. By October 2024, her failure to record my complaints, investigate the illegal removal of my medication, and the abandonment of a patient, underscored her ongoing negligence and dereliction of duty. I soon realised that the title of human rights lawyer at the Human Rights Commission appeared to be nothing more than a token designation, serving only to enable and perpetuate abuses. As my evidence grew, it became clear that these organisations were not just incompetent but actively engaged in systemic violence against those they were supposed to protect. The stripping of my medication—a blatant act of cruelty—was ignored entirely, further proving their dereliction of duty. The Human Rights Commission, in particular, seemed more invested in protecting its image than addressing the abuses inflicted on a disability pensioner. Through expanding the situation in my mind, and laying out a trap for these institutions, I started to document all of these failures and violations, and invite those who are complicit to incriminate themselves. Each letter I sent was designed to elicit responses that would incriminate them further. From Burgess’s initial deflection to the systemic refusal to log or investigate my complaints, the pattern of negligence was undeniable. Even their attempts to taunt or mock me played into my hands, revealing their arrogance and lack of accountability. What they failed to realise was that their own words were the most damning evidence against them. In their efforts to maintain control and dismiss my claims, they handed me everything I needed to expose their corruption. Their responses revealed a system incapable of upholding even the most basic principles of human rights, let alone protecting vulnerable individuals. This culminated in a court brief detailing the criminal failures of Mary Burgess and the Human Rights Commission. The brief outlined their blatant disregard for the duties of a human rights lawyer: their failure to advocate for clients’ rights, their refusal to investigate informed consent violations, and their complicity in systemic coercion. The evidence was undeniable, handed to me on a silver platter by those who thought themselves untouchable. This is just a brief preview of what’s to come. I have recorded phone calls, over 100 emails sent, responses from institutions, and a wealth of evidence that has yet to be revealed. Credits: I would also like to extend my gratitude to those who unknowingly contributed their names and letters from various departments over the past two years 🙏
Thank you for all that you do 😊
Why oh why do they never answer any questions? It is quite concerning if they don't know what is going on
Don’t trust these taxpayer funded clowns one little bit ! Always take it on notice and never get an answer back, look at the stats .
Thank you for your excellent work senator. Please keep the pressure on .
Keep at them Malcolm!
If they say no permits have been issued, would you believe them? I certainly wouldn’t!
did albo pay cash for his new house
In other words they wont do anything and don't give a shit
Why do those government shills take questions on notice when actual they no notice whatsoever when they leave the room
He works unrelentlessly on these and other issues. Wish we had him here in England he would rattle a few cages.
How is it possible that people that work in a particular field cannot answer questions relating to that particular topic. If when I was working in the aged care system didn't know my job I would have been fired.
Semangat dan semoga sukses sampai titik akir dan salam dari saya Maksummarsompel Sumpil manuk maksum mania njabon selopuro blitar jawatimur indonesia matursuwon
Malcolm, the time for questioning these people is over, it's time they started to be prosecuted, for their crimes against humanity or sacked for their incompetence.
We need to ban mrna vaccines
When these parasites are brought before a committee to ‘pleas explain’, they basically shit themselves. So used to having their way and being in control. Well done Malcolm.
Thank you for your never ending efforts for the people
Why do Australian NGO's and businesses have to be forced to Buy Australian. It should be 1st preference.
Good on you Malcom
Perhaps this is a more important issue Forever chemicals" are almost impossible to avoid. They can be found in clothes, cosmetics, furnishings, non-stick cookware, food packaging — and, in rare occasions, end up in water from the kitchen tap. The chemicals, technically known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS, encompass a class of more than 14,000 synthetic compounds. As their nickname suggests, forever chemicals persist in the environment, taking hundreds to thousands of years to naturally break down, and there are growing concerns about their potential health effects in humans.
Thank you for your tireless efforts, in keeping the corrupt governments in line.
Great work 🙏
Since the High Court held that forced ankle bracelets and curfews on ex-detainees are unconstitutional and punitive, the government has indicated its intention to legislate measures that would empower the Minister to enforce restrictions for the purpose of ensuring community safety.
This approach is likely to fail for the same reasons outlined by the High Court in YBFZ.
What is needed instead is legislation to expand the judiciary's power to order such measures, which would ensure separation of powers, rather than leaving it with the Minister, who is part of the Executive.
... See MoreSee Less
The high court seems hell bent on not wanting to protect the law abiding Australian public but instead bow to the wishes of a woke Labor government.
Unconstitutional : so government now thinks it’s above acting inside our Commonwealth Constitution. Government’s should be removed immediately. Shouldn’t be surprised, given that past and current government continue to ignore their role, to first and foremost uphold our Commonwealth Constitution values and boundaries.
what is needed is that they are sent back
These criminals lost their rights the moment they broke the law. The high court needs to put community safety above criminals.
The judge who decided this outcome should be held accountable for anything that happens
Crime pays here in Australia, it's the law abiding citizens getting hammered, the government can't afford a strong united population, divide & conquer still rings true.
That’s exactly the role of governments: legislators with “limited” powers. Any legislation must be within the boundaries of our Original Commonwealth Constitution. Pages 676, 791 & 794 in the Annotated Commonwealth of Australia Constitution states neither the Federal nor the state parliaments are sovereign bodies they are only legislators with “limited” authority. They’ve been operating outside the afforded limitations for years.
Those who came here do not have rights under the Constitution. Deport them
Deportation is the ONLY real answer. When they show continual disdain and actual hatred for our laws and the Australian people they should not be allowed to live here.
We have a citizen led referendum to remove New Zealand from the world health organization. We have five months, and a limit of $50,000 to obtain 400,000 wet ink signatures to trigger this referendum,. I'm conscious of Senator Malcolm Roberts , Senator Babet , Senator Gerard Rennick and Senator Alex Antic by following your estimates committee and your page. The person who's hard work with the submission process that has got this initiative going is Kirsten Murfitt who is a political candidate and a lawyer. There are over a million New Zealand Citizens that love and reside in Australia, we are yet to have a way to bring awareness to them outside social media. We have RCR Reality Check Radio NZ of which you have been a valued guests, as has your party leader Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party Pauline Hanson's One Nation - Western Australia . If New Zealand is able to gain 400,000 wet ink signatures in the next five months, the referendum to leave the world Health Organization will go ahead. I reach out today, and Pray 🙏 that we will find support, political support from abroad, and I truly believe that it would be a powerful precedent set from one commonwealth nation that may be politically advantageous as we see more public awareness of the influence of this corrupted global entity on our respective sovereign commonwealth nations. Please Admin, make @Senator Malcom Roberts and Senator Pauline Hanson aware of our referendum, we are a small population, we need as much help and endorsement we can muster Sincerely Luke Selby
Deport the rock-apes
Perhaps we need to re-deploy those drones!
Exposé: Human Rights Commission Lawyer Facing Criminal Charges From the middle of 2024, after observing how the Human Rights Commission and other regulatory bodies responded to complaints from vulnerable individuals, I decided with colleagues to turn this into a journalistic exposé. This was never about receiving $40 million or seeking resolution through corrupt avenues—that was the bait. The real goal was to investigate the investigators, to document how far the system would go to deflect, mock, and avoid accountability, not just for disability pensioners but for the broader Australian population. While those in positions meant to protect the public believed they were playing their usual games, they were, in fact, feeding my collection of their own failures, and shaming themselves with juvenile attempts to mock and strip me of my rights. The violations I’ve endured are real, and so is my unwavering intention to inform the public of these injustices in whatever creative way I choose. Exposé of the Human Rights Commissions of Australia: A Systemic Failure in Protecting Human Rights My story began in late 2022 when, during a medical marijuana consultation, I was told by a doctor that I could be arrested if I didn’t use a vaporiser. This shocking assertion opened the door to what would become a journey of systemic failure, gaslighting, and outright mocking from multiple regulatory bodies and human rights organisations. What followed was a consistent pattern of informed consent violations, failure to log complaints, deflections, and dismissals from institutions such as the TGA, OHO, OQO, and the Human Rights Commission. These violations, along with the dismissal of my concerns, ultimately led to a medical marijuana dispensary stripping me of my medication for questioning their informed consent practices. This left me to face a system that has not only harmed, abused and mocked myself, but countless others. The Human Rights Commission’s Queensland Advocacy and Inclusion (QAI) group, led by human rights lawyer Mary Burgess, played a central role in this debacle. After contacting the QAI and speaking directly with Burgess about the coercion, informed consent violations, and threats of possible arrest I had faced, I received a response that was nothing short of astounding, but not surprising. Burgess completely ignored the core issue of informed consent, choosing instead to suggest I change doctors and imply that my prescribed medication was too strong—an absurd stance for a human rights lawyer to take, offering medical advice instead of investigating clear violations of informed consent. Her actions revealed her true role—not as an advocate for human rights, but as a tool of the system, working to protect the status quo at the expense of those she was meant to defend. What followed was a complete breakdown of what a human rights lawyer’s responsibilities should be. Burgess’s deflections and failures to investigate or log my complaints laid bare the systemic rot within the Human Rights Commission. The duties of a human rights lawyer—protecting the vulnerable, advocating for justice, and holding systems accountable—were utterly abandoned. Her role became not one of justice but of complicity, shielding the very system that had violated me. Recognizing this, I began systematically correlating and baiting the institutions with my real complaints in the middle of 2024 to prove they would ignore anything that mentioned informed consent or violations by doctors and medical dispensaries. The failures of every institution involved, from regulatory boards to the Human Rights Commission itself, were carefully documented. I understood early on that each letter of deflection and every piece of bureaucratic red tape was another nail in the coffin of those who believed themselves untouchable. Their arrogance blinded them to the fact that their responses were feeding my case, providing all the evidence I needed to incriminate them. From the outset, my complaints to the TGA, OHO, and OQO were met with predictable scripts. After the first two dismissals, it became clear their playbook relied on deflecting blame and gaslighting me with responses like “your marijuana is too strong” or “you need to change doctors.” These tactics only emboldened me to push further, knowing they would expose their failures with every reply. At every step, their deflections only strengthened my case, including one instance where an OHO officer smugly responded, “I understand that vaporisers can explode, but the doctor has done nothing wrong.” When I called to ask why he ignored the informed consent violations, he repeatedly said to “put in a complaint about me,” fully aware it would perpetuate the cycle of disregarding human rights. Mary Burgess, a lawyer with the Human Rights Commission, proved no different. Following our initial phone call, her written response in 2023 was dismissive and evasive. By October 2024, her failure to record my complaints, investigate the illegal removal of my medication, and the abandonment of a patient, underscored her ongoing negligence and dereliction of duty. I soon realised that the title of human rights lawyer at the Human Rights Commission appeared to be nothing more than a token designation, serving only to enable and perpetuate abuses. As my evidence grew, it became clear that these organisations were not just incompetent but actively engaged in systemic violence against those they were supposed to protect. The stripping of my medication—a blatant act of cruelty—was ignored entirely, further proving their dereliction of duty. The Human Rights Commission, in particular, seemed more invested in protecting its image than addressing the abuses inflicted on a disability pensioner. Through expanding the situation in my mind, and laying out a trap for these institutions, I started to document all of these failures and violations, and invite those who are complicit to incriminate themselves. Each letter I sent was designed to elicit responses that would incriminate them further. From Burgess’s initial deflection to the systemic refusal to log or investigate my complaints, the pattern of negligence was undeniable. Even their attempts to taunt or mock me played into my hands, revealing their arrogance and lack of accountability. What they failed to realise was that their own words were the most damning evidence against them. In their efforts to maintain control and dismiss my claims, they handed me everything I needed to expose their corruption. Their responses revealed a system incapable of upholding even the most basic principles of human rights, let alone protecting vulnerable individuals. This culminated in a court brief detailing the criminal failures of Mary Burgess and the Human Rights Commission. The brief outlined their blatant disregard for the duties of a human rights lawyer: their failure to advocate for clients’ rights, their refusal to investigate informed consent violations, and their complicity in systemic coercion. The evidence was undeniable, handed to me on a silver platter by those who thought themselves untouchable. This is just a brief preview of what’s to come. I have recorded phone calls, over 100 emails sent, responses from institutions, and a wealth of evidence that has yet to be revealed. Credits: I would also like to extend my gratitude to those who unknowingly contributed their names and letters from various departments over the past two years 🙏
If the ‘ex’detainees require trackers then why are they still here. Send them back to their country. You don’t manage a home invasion by letting him stay in your house with a monitor on. You boot them out.
And how'd all this do gooder crap workout now our kids are rats as well
And then we have to have Magistrates who will actually apply those laws. "Go soft" seems to be their motto.
The world is mental. All these people working against the Australian people. Illegals and murderers and pedophiles have more rights than we do. Time to drain the swamp. The world is purposely being destroyed time to wake up people.
we have them here in the NT can be ordered by the courts.by and by they are a failure.
They are here illegally, not Australian citizens yet are covered by our constitution??? This needs to be appealed. We need a major investigation & overhaul of our judiciary - they need to be held to account.
Semangat dan semoga sukses sampai titik akir dan salam dari saya Maksummarsompel Sumpil manuk maksum mania njabon selopuro blitar jawatimur indonesia matursuwon
Meanwhile crime is rampant in this country and getting worse. We hear more about protecting the rights of the criminals rather than the rights of the victims, why?
What about the Unconstitutional Democide which clearly states in the Constitution you know the one the Parliament committed treason against. The only criminals we are coming for is the parliament
Albo's boss ???
Here's a thought....send the scum back where they came from....🤨
🇭🇲
BREAKING: YouTube has suddenly banned me from uploading, posting or live streaming for two weeks
The reason given is dozens of videos, some more than 6 months old, that have only now been flagged as an issue.
This includes multiple videos calling for a COVID Royal Commission.
Thank you for meme, David
I co-signed the Digital ID Repeal Bill alongside Senators Antic, Babet, Canavan, Hanson and Rennick, which was introduced into the Senate earlier today.
This Bill aims to repeal the government's dystopian and ill-conceived Digital ID Bill.
What everyday Australians need is a… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805872597449818132
2 years ago I promised to hound down those responsible for the damage our COVID measures caused to Australians.
Today, in company with Senators Antic, Canavan, Rennick and O'Sullivan, a Bill was introduced to immediately commence a Senate Select Commission of Inquiry into our… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805533759519048180
Australia declared the most expensive country for housing in the English speaking world.
Ban foreigners buying houses and cut immigration now!
ALL NEWS
Malcolm’s press releases, speeches and other stories
ANZAC Day 2021
NationalANZAC Day: Lest We Forget
Foreign Ownership, Property RightsMEDIA RELEASES
Malcolm’s latest media announcements
SPEECHES
Malcolm’s latest Speeches to Parliament
Malcolm’s Issues
Pages
Malcolm’s Fight
Categories
- April 2022
- Assets
- Budget 20-21
- Climate Change
- COVID
- Digital Identity Bill
- Energy
- Events
- February 2022
- Foreign Ownership
- Hybrid Bradfield
- Industrial Relations
- Infrastructure
- March 2021
- May/June 2021
- Media
- Media Release
- Murray Darling Basin
- National
- October 2021
- October 2023
- Podcasts
- Property Rights
- Queensland
- Senate Estimates
- Senate Inquiry Public Hearings
- Speeches
- Uncategorized
- United Nations
- Water