Warning: Distressing Content. New Zealand authorities have lawfully ‘kidnapped’ a child from his parents to forcibly perform a medical treatment on him when there was an equally valid treatment available that the parents supported. Baby William required a blood transfusion which the parents agreed to as long as the blood was from unvaccinated donors. The parents had found suitable donors for the request yet NZ health authorities declined it. The matter ended up in the courts which ruled in favour of the authorities.
The judge said the parents would remain the guardians of the child but all health matters would now be determined by the State. The Mother was not allowed to hold Will all night. She was not allowed to cuddle him. She was also not allowed to sleep all night, as she was told that if she did any of this, she would be forcibly removed back to the ward, from the pre-op room, and would not see the baby before the operation.
The traumatic way in which this situation has been treated does not make sense. This video is confronting but it is the reality of what medical tyranny really means.
Some years ago I read a book by Eve Hillary called Sarah’s Last Wish. It happened some years ago in NSW to a rural family who wanted to get a second opinion and medical treatment for their young daughter who had a rare form of cancer. As is happening now in NZ,the state took custody of the child. In this case they forced chemotherapy on the girl who reacted badly to it and soon after died. I could not read more than a chapter of the book at a time and maintain a healthy blood pressure. Since when does the state think it has the right to do with us what it likes? It does not own us. It does not own our children
This is shocking. The parents must decide what treatment their baby receives, not the hospital, not the blood bank and certainly not politicians or their lackeys the ‘police’ force. If unadulterated blood was offered, there is no medical reason why it was not used. This is medical fascism in spades.
The sheer wrongness of the medical authority’s refusal to work with the parents and allow the baby to receive the transfusion from an unvaccinated person, and the involvement of the police in enforcing that decision, is compounded by their willful ignorance of the reasons for the parent’s concern. The apparent minority that has taken the trouble to become medically informed of the mechanisms for harm inherent in the mRNA vaccines and the litany of injuries suffered by many thousands worldwide, would naturally be hesitant to receive blood from vaccinated persons.
Would they have done the same if the family was JW? JWs refuse any blood transfusions whatsoever.
Yes if they were JWs the government would have most definitely intervened and forced a blood transfusion especially if it’s a baby. There’s a history of this being done even to adults.
Yes, I believe so. They can not force an adult but a child is a minor and is treated differently. I think the same would occur with children that are perceived to be at risk of abuse, harm or death.
This is so devastating and clearly shows the tyranny and control our governments and health professionals are exerting on our fundamental rights as humans of choice. In NZ and already in so many other countries, this is everywhere. Now all jabbed will not want to attend a hospital, medical procedure for fear of using tainted blood and a total lack of trust in the system.
This is so devastating and clearly shows the tyranny and control our governments and health professionals are exerting on our fundamental rights as humans of choice. In NZ and already in so many other countries, this is everywhere. Now all un jabbed will not want to attend a hospital or medical procedure for fear of using tainted blood and a quite frankly a total lack of trust in the system we once never questioned.
Not very pleasant to watch the panic-stricken mother. However, (and I’m only asking the question, not making a statement) is this situation different from children being removed from natural or foster parents because of some perceived risk to life and limb?
I don’t trust the system anymore and the last 2 years have been a huge waking up call, but saying that, when I first saw the video, I could not understand the reason behind it: why is the police taking the kid? For what reason? What kind of medical treatment? I like to know all the motives behind a story to be completely objective on the matter. Now I know. NOW I AM FURIOUS! I cannot imagine the desperation the poor parents are going through….
This is disgusting what the NZ government is doing to its people. Removing their rights to their own children but if something happened to the child the parents will be the one to suffer not the government. It’s really a tyrannical way, with no human rights, how this kind of government still in power, is the question. NZ government is run by people who is doing havoc all over the world.