It’s sickening that this has been allowed to happen. Hopefully the time has come that the studies will start to be done. This new US administration should shake things up a bit.

But its complusory in Australia and has been for years.

Not my family.

Imagine being upset at him for being the messenger instead of the corrupt corporations

What a great move that RFK joined the Trump team . His going to bring out corruption

Hopefully RFK will do the studies so there is no doubt any longer

Geoff Anderson

Government/ Health Departments constantly pumping poison into our children. Shame on all who do this.

Greed and corporate big pharma corruption.

Why aren't we fully explained these risks by Drs and nurses when our children are born. They can't get the shots in them fast enough and don't declare the extra bonuses they receive for doing so.

IS that why the Labor Party want to ban information from the USA. Now that Trump is in office , Mr. Kennedy will be releasing all this information and data?

They depopulate Africa with “vaccines” and deny them resources and development because “climate change”

They Have been doing long term testing, on Africans and Indians! That's why they vaccinated the most populated countries on the planet. To test how lethal the are! And when the populations are over a billion, they can afford to kill as many as they like and it wont ever be noticed, because they breed as fast as they fall.

The first mistake you made was listening to rfk. He tends to make things up. "Based on the available scientific evidence, there are several inaccuracies and misleading claims in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s statements about the DTP vaccine: 1. The DTP vaccine has not been banned in the US. It was replaced by the DTaP vaccine in the 1990s, which has a lower risk of side effects. The DTP vaccine is still used in many countries. 2. The claim that DTP caused severe brain injuries or death in 1 in 300 children is not supported by scientific evidence. Serious adverse events from DTP were much rarer. 3. The DTP vaccine is still used in Europe and many other countries, not just Africa. 4. The Danish study he refers to likely means a 2017 study by Mogensen et al. This study had significant methodological limitations and its findings have not been replicated in larger, more robust studies. 5. Multiple large studies, including those cited in the search results, have not found a 10-fold increase in mortality among girls receiving DTP. Some studies found no increased risk, while others found more modest increases that require further investigation. 6. There is no evidence that DTP ruins children's immune systems or makes them more susceptible to other diseases. In fact, vaccines generally strengthen immunity. 7. Long-term vaccine safety studies are routinely conducted in the US and other countries. While some observational studies have raised questions about potential non-specific effects of DTP, especially in girls, the evidence is mixed and inconclusive. The majority of evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of DTP in preventing serious diseases. The World Health Organization continues to recommend DTP vaccination based on its proven benefits outweighing potential risks. More research is needed to fully understand any non-specific effects, but current evidence does not support Kennedy's alarming claims." Citations: [1] ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545173/ [2] academic.oup.com/cid/article/69/4/726/5316263?login=false [3] academic.oup.com/ije/article/33/2/374/715842 [4] cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/covid-19.html [5] health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/ [6] cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00048610.htm [7] nature.com/articles/d42859-020-00013-8 [8] academic.oup.com/ije/article/43/3/645/2949557?login=false [9] adc.bmj.com/content/97/8/685 [10] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9194613/ [11] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9513329/ [12] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5155548/

I call BS, I'm paying $950 a week, how are we supposed to save and even then be told we cant afford the mortgage,,, seriously. Somethings gotta give

increasingly insane !! its frightening

My government subsidy ended in Qld, so my rent doubled & I was made homeless

We are LandLords for a property in Central Coast NSW. The Real Estates are part of the problem and will give you a good examples. We had new Tenants move in March 2021 after renovations . The rent we thought was reasonable but after one year our Real Estate emailed us and says the market rent around your area are $$$. Which you can increase your rent for minimum of $25.00 a week . Rang our agent and said , we have tenants that pay 2 weeks in advanced and looks after our property reasonable why would we want to increase the rent that much? Answer that is the guideline around the area and we could increase it $85.00 a week. We said because our Water Rates, Land Rates and House Insurance increased high we have decided to increase it at $15.00 a week . Since 2022 we decided not to increase the rent. My opinion is the Real Estates are big part of the problem encouraging the LandLords to increase the rent high. I can understand the mortgage rate rise increase high during that period which some Landlords had no choice for a higher increase. Unfortunately there are Greedy Landlords that will take advantage of the Australian citizens. I get very sad when I hear information from the media of people living in cars and are homeless. Our Governments hold all responsible of our mortgage rates and inflation yet they don’t care. Bringing in loads of immigration in Australia to keep their GDP on level is causing more problems to our housing market. We are being run by governments that follow the globalist elites like the UN, WHO and the WEF which are all a unelected body . We need someone like Trump that will stand up to these elites coming also from countries like UK, Canada, New Zealand, France , part of Europe and NATO. When are Australians going to wake up especially when our woke government is going to put the misinformation and disinformation bill through which the governments, media and universities are exempt from the bill.

Yep we will vote them out and the greens

Mate that would mean we would comfortable and happy about the government....of course they will not do that. They are trying to starve us to death.

Maybe if we taxed Santos...

This is coursing the CRISIS....We need to CUT back ...

Rents were on the rise during the pandemic and there was zero immigration during those 3 years. Thoughts in this Malcom

Labor is drowning Oz.......Get them out .

Developers won’t build with these high interest rates and taxes

And tax resource extraction appropriately

Where are these immigration numbers being published? I thought it was 400k per year and that that was steep

Of course he is ,meanwhile he’s got his New $4 million house ,So he doesn’t give a shit about us .

And why are they all coming from Asia! We are not their people. And they aren’t ours. They should primarily come from Europe where we share cultural similarities.

Hahaha. Have a chat to the mining companies in Queensland as to why you guys aren't feeling as rich as you should. I'll give you a clue.. (it's not immigration)

Respectfully asking that you challenge Sen Hanson for the leadership of the party. We need a Coalition of KAP UAP and One Nation. And we need it now!!!!!!!!!!!

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

Maybe we should be taxing mining companies taking our natural resources more

The dolt gov 'caused the housing crisis by bringing all the bally immigrants in. We don't want anymore of them.......these albosleezy, commi dolts are out to destroy the country for the sake of the super inhuman Schwaus and his fkwt mates.

Ask our WEF owned government why??? Wakey wakey sheeple

please explain exactly what you mean by visa holders..my sister, who lives in the USA, is here at the moment on a tourist visa..she's staying at my home and spending her money in MY town. Is SHE..who isn't stealing a home or a job, from anyone ...counted in your numbers. And why are ABS figures contrary to yours. A bit more detail would be welcome. I'm sure, as a Senator..you have them at your fingertips. Thank you ( in advance) for more clarity which will enable us all to have more of a think about our Immigration numbers.

(B.A. Bible/Biology)* GOD, SCIENCE, AND GENESIS HOW WOULD something be fit for survival while it was supposedly evolving? Partially evolved limbs, tissues, organs, structures would render any species unfit for survival while supposedly waiting millions of years to become complete. For example, “if a leg of a reptile were to evolve (over supposedly millions of years) into a wing of a bird, it would become a bad leg long before it became a good wing” (Dr. Walt Brown, scientist and creationist). Only limited evolution or micro-evolution (variations within a natural species such as varieties of dogs, cats, horses, cows, etc.) is genetically possible in nature but not macro-evolution (i.e. from sea sponge to human). The genes already exist in all species for micro-evolution to be possible but not for macro-evolution, and there’s no evidence that nature can engineer (via accidental changes or mutations of the genetic code) entirely new genes or new genetic code for macro-evolution to occur. I discuss in more depth and detail the subject of genetic mutations and other issues in my larger Internet article, NATURAL LIMITS OF EVOLUTION published in Medium dot com. What about natural selection? Natural selection doesn't produce biological traits or variations. It can only "select" from biological variations that are possible and which have survival value. The real issue is what biological variations are possible, not natural selection. Natural selection is simply another term for survival of the fittest. For example, if a change in skin color occurs that helps a species to adapt or survive in its environment then that adaptation or survival is called “natural selection” by scientists. All real evolution in nature is simply the expression, over time, of already existing genes or variations of already existing genes. For example, we have breeds of dogs today that we didn’t have a few hundred years ago. The genes for these breeds had always existed in the dog population but never had opportunity before to be expressed. Only limited evolution, variations of already existing genes and traits, is possible. People often ask how all the varieties of humans could have descended from Adam and Eve. But, in principle this is no different than asking how children with different color hair can come from the same parents who both have black hair. Just as some couples today carry the genes to produce children with different color hair, so too Adam and Eve, our first parents, carried the genes to produce all the varieties and "races" of people. You and I today may not possess the genes for producing various races, but Adam and Eve did possess such genes. Dog breeders know that you can get a pure breed from a mutt, but you can't get a mutt from a pure breed. A mutt carries genes to produce pure breeds and races. Adam and Eve, our first parents, were mutts! All of the similarities between various species are better explained because of a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in all the various forms of life. A dog has to breathe the same air as humans so the Creator designed dogs with similar lungs as humans have. It doesn't mean that dogs and humans must be related because we share similarities. There are no fossils of partially evolved species (i.e. partially evolved fish, crabs, dinosaurs) to show evidence that all life went through a process of millions of years of evolution. All species in the fossil record are complete and fully formed. This is powerful evidence that they came into existence as complete and fully formed, which is only possible by special creation. Look around you. Do you see any partially evolved birds, worms, chipmunks? Even if macro-evolution takes millions of years we should still be able to see some evidence of it occurring today. Why aren't we seeing partially evolved creatures (species) all around us today as evidence for macro-evolution still occurring? Interestingly, what some (not all) evolutionists interpret as dinosaur feathers may have been nothing more than "artifacts of the fossilization process, or partly decayed skin fibers." There's strong evidence that other structures interpreted as feathers are woolly plumages and collagen fibers. A few evolutionists (not even most) interpret these structures as proto-feathers and have artists drawing dinosaurs with fancy feathers for magazines and newspapers! More recent evidence from preserved dinosaur skin has shown that there were no anchor holes in the skin to hold feathers. All the fossils that have been used to support human evolution have been found to be either hoaxes, non-human, or human, but not non-human and human (i.e. Neanderthal Man was discovered later to be fully human). Textbooks and museums still continue to display examples and illustrations supporting human evolution which most evolutionists have rejected and no longer support. Many diagrams of ape-man like creatures over the years were reconstructed according to evolutionary interpretations from disputable bones that have now been discredited even by many evolutionists but still being taught in school textbooks. There has never been unanimous agreement among evolutionary scientists on ANY fossil evidence that has been used to support human evolution over the many years, including LUCY. Also, so-called "Junk DNA" isn't junk. Although these "non-coding" segments of DNA don't code for proteins, they have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (i.e. when, where, and how genes are expressed, so they're not "junk"). The various nucleic acids that make up DNA are found in a sequence, just like letters in a sentence. It's this sequence that makes DNA a code. There's no law in science that they have to be in a sequence. All this is a powerful evidence of a supreme Designer. God began with a perfect and harmonious creation, which became imperfect after the first man and woman sinned against God. Even all the animals were vegetarian (Genesis 1:30) in the beginning and did not struggle for survival nor kill and devour each other. Evolutionary theory does not begin with a perfect and harmonious creation as the Bible states. The Bible and evolutionary theory cannot both be true. Science cannot prove the existence of God, but the scientific evidence points to God. Where did God come from? Unlike the universe, God’s nature doesn’t require a beginning. We know from science that the universe requires a beginning because the universe could not have sustained itself eternally due to the law of entropy. Many arguments of evolutionists are answered on my Internet site, THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION. Just Google search the title followed by my name or go to: creationismnow.blogspot[dot]com Although I am a conservative Christian (Reformed Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches or supports the traditional doctrine of hell with its teaching of eternal torment or suffering. The Bible does teach eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. The Scripture teaches that God’s wrath is not an end in itself but a means to an end. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scripture passages have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. *The author, Babu G. Ranganathan, has his B.A. with concentrations in Bible and Biology and has given successful lectures (with question and answer period afterwards) defending creation from science before evolutionist science faculty and students at various colleges and universities. The author has been recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis "Who's Who in The East" for his writings on religion and science.

Greed!