Even though the government says they don’t want to mandate vaccination, they haven’t ruled out attaching it to everyday activities. That means they won’t rule out that you might have to be vaccinated to go to the pub which sounds as good as mandating it to me.
I believe in the vaccine being available to anyone who wants to take it, but it should be every individual’s choice whether they take it or not. I do not believe they should be government mandated. Where do you stand?
Transcript
[Malcolm Roberts]
Thank you chair. And thank you all for attending. What percentage of the population, that will, will receive a COVID 19 vaccine? Do you expect or plan?
[Brendan Murphy]
Well, we were, our target at present Senator, is to vaccinate all the adult population, the over eighteens off by the end of October, give them a first dose. So that’s I think approximately 20 million, I think?
About, about 20 million going on.
Yeah. Now we may then go on and vaccinate children. If we have vaccines that are registered and approved for children. And if they prevent transmission and that helps us with herd immunity, but there are no vaccine. There’s no trial data on children at the moment. So the vaccines are only registered for adults.
Or 16 to 18 in the case of one. But no nobody under 16 has a registered product at this point.
[Malcolm Roberts]
Will that include the elderly, the frail?
[Brendan Murphy]
Absolutely. Unless there is a medical contraindication which is very rare. So if someone is very close to end of life it may be decided that it’s not appropriate. But in general, absolutely. That’s what we’re doing in residential aged care. Vaccinating a lot of very elderly and very frail people.
[Malcolm Roberts]
Thank you. Do you have the constitutional or legislative power in your opinion, to impose mandatory vaccination?
[Brendan Murphy]
The government policy is very clear that we’re not. We’ve never imposed mandatory vaccination in Australia. We take the approach that we want to encourage, promote and provide the evidence for vaccination. There have been situations where, for example, with flu vaccination last year in aged care where there was a public health order that the States and territories made. That decided that you couldn’t enter a facility unless you had proof of flu vaccination. But that was that’s very different from, from making, from mandating a vaccine. It just means that you have to make a choice about whether you go into an aged care facility. And obviously for childhood immunisation similar rules have applied. With again, mostly enforced by the States and territories, with no jab no play and government policy with no jab, no pay. But none of those have said that you are by law required to be vaccinated.
[Malcolm Roberts]
In the States?
[Brendan Murphy]
Yeah, In the States. Nobody can force a medical intervention on another citizen. We can do a lot of things to encourage, promote. And in some cases to restrict situations of risk if you’re not vaccinated. But we have never taken the view that we can force a citizen to have a medical intervention.
[Malcolm Roberts]
And you won’t be taking that view.
[Brendan Murphy]
I, I can’t imagine. That’s not, we wouldn’t recommend it.
[Witness]
There is absolutely no proposal from the government to make any COVID vaccine compulsory for anybody.
[Malcolm Roberts]
So are there any policies or plans or ideas or has it been discussed to make something unavailable without the vaccine? Effectively making it compulsory?
[Brendan Murphy]
Well, again, there has been discussion at HBPC. About whether, and Professor Kelly can comment on that, whether, at some stage we might use the same approach that we used for flu last year. To say that if the COVID vaccine is really effective at preventing transmission, that to say that to work in aged care or to enter a facility you need to have a vaccination. But HBPC has decided that; A, there isn’t enough evidence on prevention of transmission at the moment. And, B it would be silly for such a public health order to be introduced until such time as all of those workers and community members who might visit aged care have had the opportunity to be vaccinated. So that is, that’s a live matter for consideration that will be reviewed as the evidence evolves.
[Malcolm Roberts]
Okay.
[Witness]
No, I’ll just be very clear here though, that the current position of the government is that this vaccine is voluntary and not withstanding that the HPCs work and the, and the health departments work. But the government’s position is very clear, that the vaccine is voluntary.
[Malcolm Roberts]
Thank you. And thank you, Dr. Murphy. I’ll just jump outside of vaccines for a minute. To understand the overall context, and then come back to vaccines. What are the main factors in managing a pandemic? I’ll just test my own knowledge with you first. Is isolate and arrest the vaccine, which is called a lockdown, I understand. Then there’s number two is, identify the location and the spread to get on top of the quickly. What’s that? testing, tracing and quarantine. Then there are attempts to reduce the transmissibility through restrictions like masks, gatherings, criticism, movement of people, sorry, not criticism, movement of people. Then the fourth one would be cure and prophylactic areas to try and prevent, to try and cure people of the virus. For example, antivirals. Number five would be vaccine. Have I, have any, have I included any that are wrong? Have I missed any?
[Brendan Murphy]
Well you’ve missed international borders, which is probably…
[Malcolm Roberts]
Isolate and arrest.
[Brendan Murphy]
Yeah, well, certainly that has been one of our most successful interventions. Was to prevent the importation of a virus from, despite all the impact that it’s had on our citizens overseas. It has been one of the most singularly important parts of our success in controlling COVID.
[Malcolm Roberts]
So there’s just isolate and arrest, which I include international borders. Identify the location and spread through testing, tracing, quarantine. Reduce the transmissibility through restrictions. Cure and prophylactic approach and vaccine.
[Malcolm Roberts]
That seems pretty complete Professor Kelly?
[Professor Kelly]
individual behaviours.
[Malcolm Roberts]
Sorry?
[Professor Kelly]
Individual behaviours. So the hand hygiene, cough into your elbow, that sort of stuff.
[Malcolm Roberts]
Okay. Thank you.
The following line of questioning occured after the end of the attached video clip (see HANSARD)
[Chair]
The last question.
[Malcolm Roberts]
Sure. Can I get, on notice, an assessment of the characteristics of the virus? We were told initially it was a respiratory disease and we shoved ventilators at people. Some people were telling us that it hinders the blood absorbing oxygen or uptaking oxygen. We were told about various treatments. Perhaps you could tell me, on notice, what are the characteristics you measure to assess the virus’s mortality and
transmissibility, and any other characteristics of the virus, and perhaps rank it relative to, for example, the decreasing order of impact. We’ve had the Black Death, the Plague of Justinian, smallpox, the Antonine Plague, the Spanish flu, the third plague, HIV/AIDS and now COVID-19, which is a fraction of the population affected. Is it possible to get that summary?
[Brendan Murphy]
We can certainly provide it. This virus is now well studied. Essentially, as we’ve said on many occasions, for most fit, young people it’s a relatively mild disease, but 126,000 people have died in the UK, a very similar country to us. We have avoided a very large death rate by controlling this virus, and we’re very proud of that achievement, Senator. Whilst it may be a mild disease, that means it transmits wildly. Older people and people with underlying conditions are at risk of getting severe respiratory disease and dying, as they have done in their millions around the world.
[Malcolm Roberts]
Thank you. Thank you, Chair.
Hi to all. To me it is so simple…if you want the vaccine then by all means take it, but if you don’t then none has the right to violate my body. However, I can see economic sanctions coming against those that take that stance. So that will make it mandatory in essence. We will be in a position to literally starve etc losing pensions, the right to enter a shop etc) So thems the facts.
Absolutely spot on. Planning to cut off pensions and Centrelink to those who don’t take it.
If they cut pensions then thy will have to return all the tax taken over the years of one’s working life, taken under false pretences.
Unfortunately even Pfizer and Merck’s trials showed 95% efficacy in preventing symptoms of COVID-19 and only 2% efficacy in the prevention of transmission and infection of the SARS-CoV-2 the virus that causes COVID-19 so why are we launching a large scale vaccination program, using a vaccine that is registered as experimental that has had no long term trials. And if the virus has shown to not effect children why would we even consider putting their health at risk with this experimental vaccine. We keep forgetting that these vaccines are still considered experimental.
Thank you, Malcolm, for questioning Brendan Murphy. Of course, every option has been left open, from the equivalence of ‘mandation’, to ‘mandation’ itself. A decent in touch with reality government would rule out any form of coercion altogether.
Acknowledgment should be made of the immunity levels gained by those people (just with asymptomatic or mild symptoms) who successfully self defended against this virus during times when this category of cases were not permitted to be tested. This group of citizens have been bullied when they state that since they are already immune (yet can’t prove it) they do not require a vaccine as well. The artificial means of gaining immunity should only be for those who have not already gained immunity through exposure to the virus itself. After all, the administration of inoculations are to ‘catch up’ to the level of immunity already acquired through natural exposure.
Why is Ivermectin, a properly tested drug used by over 3 billion people with amazing results being blocked ! There is overwhelming evidence of its use as a re-purposed drug in treating the covid virus ! ( cheap and effective) ( research Dr Kory USA )
Why are governments pushing an experimental drug on all its people for a disease that 99.8 percent of people survive from ?
A ‘vaccine ‘ that has potential to cause much harm !
It can only be a conflict of interest! The health advisors funded by big pharma ?
As Hippocrates said ‘ first do no harm ‘ ! The government needs to take heed of this advice !
Everything I read about this vaccination reaffirms my gut feeling that I should not have it. This vaccine, each one, is an experimental drug with the due date for the trial to be completed in February 2023. I cannot understand why our Government is pushing this vaccination on its people especially considering that we are not in a pandemic nor have been in a pandemic. We are lucky that we have not been affected like other countries and therefore we can afford to have a wait and see the results attitude. I repeat this is an experimental vaccine and no vaccine has ever been made like this before. Messenger RNA is a completely new concept for a vaccination and is gene therapy. The fact is if it is not safe you could potentially kill off or harm the entire population. Surely the risk of a minority of people contacting a virus which in most cases is not life threatening, is far better taking than subjecting the whole population to an experimental, previously untested vaccine which nobody can determine the result of until a few years has past. This is madness and I can’t believe that common sense has flown out the window regarding this issue. I feel as if I am having a bizarre nightmare but it’s real.