I thank my fellow Senators for their participation in a successful debate on my Motion in defence of free speech and peaceful freedom of association. I’m not sure if some understood how the Government’s “Misinformation and Disinformation Bill” (MAD for short) will limit the right to protest. As demonstrated during COVID, posts promoting protests were banned and organisers arrested. This Bill would allow the Government to ban posts that promote protests as a threat to public order, which is why my motion mentioned both free speech and the right to protest.
In my speech, I drew attention to the bigger picture – that predatory foreign billionaires have bought Australia, and this Bill prevents us talking about it.
One Nation will continue to fight for human rights and I am pleased to know we will not be alone.
Transcript
I move:
That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency:
Freedom of speech and peaceful freedom of assembly are inalienable rights which the Senate must defend.
What do the billionaires who run the world do when we, the people, realise how much has been stolen from us—how much money, how much sovereignty, how much opportunity?
In the next few minutes, it will become obvious what this has to do with the misinformation and disinformation bill—’m-a-d’ or ‘mad’, for short. The world’s predatory billionaires do not wield their power directly; they hide behind wealth funds such as BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and First State. These funds act in concert with political change agents, including large superannuation and sovereign wealth funds such as Norges. The racket these subversive elements are running really is racketeering. They use their wealth to buy shares in companies that are then required to follow the agenda. This is not my opinion; these are the exact words of BlackRock CEO Larry Fink. Buying out Western civilisation is an expensive business. The never-ending quest for more money, more power and more control is being noticed and resisted. Much of that resistance has been a result of Elon Musk buying X and allowing the truth to live in one mainstream forum.
The minute the BlackRock racketeers walk into a boardroom, any notion of public interest is abandoned. A case in point is Coles and Woolies, who used to pride themselves on providing the necessities of life—food and clothing—at the lowest possible price through competition. With the presence of an almost complete set of predatory wealth funds on their share registers, in recent years, Coles and Woolies no longer compete against each other. Instead, they collude to pursue a pricing strategy designed to maximise profit from our necessities of life, profit that’s sent overseas into the coffers of these sovereign wealth funds, leaving Australians permanently poorer.
In 2022-23, around an election, Woolies donated $110,000 to the ALP. In 2022-23, other industries under the control of these predatory wealth funds, including the big pharmaceutical industry, donated a million dollars to the ALP. What do they get for their money? Last Tuesday, I spoke in favour of the community affairs committee inquiry report into a prospective terms of reference for a royal commission into COVID response. Despite me simply agreeing with the committee report and despite my using only peer reviewed and published science to support my position, Senator Ayres from the Labor Party chose to describe my words as—listen to this:
… damaging misinformation and disinformation … there is a reason why the ASIO director-general highlights the role of extremist misinformation and disinformation in terms of its corrosive effect. It does lead to some of the acts of violent extremism here and overseas, motivated by the same vile conspiracy theories that we’ve just heard …
Wow, what a rant! No data, no argument; just empty labels.
Our New Zealand friends started their royal commission into COVID in December 2022. New Zealand has now decided that the royal commission unearthed so much behaviour that was cause for concern they’ve expanded the royal commission to include looking into COVID in much greater depth, including vaccine harm. The New Zealand royal commission now closely resembles the royal commission the Senate standing committee on community affairs recommended following their inquiry initiated on a One Nation referral. For Senator Ayres to say this is extremist misinformation and disinformation likely to lead to acts of violent extremism is a complete slap in the face to New Zealand’s royal commission and one that Senator Ayres would be well advised to reconsider.
This is the trouble when the government panics that $1 million in donations is at risk and brings on a bill that will shut up any opposition to the rule of the billionaires through their front companies—in this case, pharmaceutical companies—a rule that is, quite simply, a threat to the future of our beautiful country. With total clarity, Senator Ayres has drawn the battle lines here. What’s the truth in New Zealand parliament is ‘extremist misinformation and disinformation’ in Australia, if the Ayres government says it is. This bill has no protections, no checks and balances—it should rightly be renamed the ‘crush any opposition to the billionaires’ bill.
While the Labor Party’s desire for totalitarian censorship is no surprise, the people need to be aware that the Morrison-Littleproud Liberals and Nationals introduced this bill. Opposition leader Dutton makes no indication of whether he intends to oppose the bill, I guess because when he gets in he’ll be happy to use its onerous provisions. While I don’t have time to go into the Liberal Party’s donations from companies under the control of the world’s predatory billionaires, the same issue affects both parties. The Morrison-Littleproud government kept the COVID vaccine contracts hidden from our requests to make the contracts public for those who paid for the injections—taxpayers. The temptation to have extra money to spend in an election campaign has proven far too much for the major parties, and their independence, their objectivity and their common sense have been compromised. The world’s predatory billionaires’ downfall will be their hubris. The question is: who will go down with them?
A very good speech Malcolm, thank you.
My question is , is there anybody listening? Is the Gov listing, I don’t think so.
Is the public listening?
I personally find it very difficult to listen to the parliament or senate debate broadcast on ABC, most just rubbish .
I did listen to your response to the attack on Dave Pellow and was surprised and very encouraged. Bless you.
We desperately need a revival of the Christian church in Australia where believers continue to pray and seek God, and use the authority of scripture to overcome the demonic powers behind the Globalist elite. That is my prayer
This Bill is scary – thank you for standing up for free speech and the right to peacefully protest.
Shocking censorship laws have been initiated . The Covid hoax lockdowns wasn’t enough eh ? The reality of this country becoming totalitarian is here now , and interesting to note that the Morrison Littleproud liberals and Nationals who introduced this directive now Albanese is following it through . Neither will “ this Lurch “ Dutton creeping around behind the political gantries commit to stopping this totalitarian regime removing our rights , yet mainstream media will not ask that question .
Next it’ll be travel restrictions for Australians to prevent from learning that other countries don’t have these laws in place
Much needed – much appreciated
Thank you for representing the majority of Australians who are fed up with all the restrictions to free speech and right to peaceful protest imposed on them. You are a champ.
Hi Malcolm, thanks again for your newsworthy updates and keeping us informed, we can’t rely on mainstream media to do this now. We were shocked to learn that it was the Morrison-Littleproud Liberals and Nationals who introduced the bill re misinformation and disinformation as we have always voted for these parties as opposed to the Labor Party, but it would now seem that this was not a wise choice, look forward to your next update, cheers Norma and Wes
Thanks Senator Roberts. It seems to me that the ALP is a bunch of Ayre-heads. If they are so insecure that they are scared to even allow someone to have a different opinion they should get out of politics and put their head up their… – I mean – where the sun doesn’t shine.
In other words democracy is inconvenient for their global agenda plans. Divide & conquer us. Our representitives, seek to destroy us & rule over us. A test for the reality of freedom. Thank goodness there seem to be a few realistic news programs popping up, hopefully not too late to inform the sleepy masses
Sent my concerns to the commission, my concerns were as follows:
**Submission on the Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024**
Dear Environment and Communications Legislation Committee,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024, which was recently referred to your committee. While the aim to safeguard against the harms caused by misinformation and disinformation is commendable, I believe that the proposed measures raise several critical issues that need to be addressed.
1. **Government Overreach and Censorship**: The bill grants the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) extensive regulatory powers over digital communications platforms. This level of oversight risks government overreach, leading to increased policing and potential censorship of content. Such measures could disempower individuals and hinder their ability to critically assess information. Rather than imposing regulatory measures, I advocate for a focus on education around misinformation and disinformation, which would better equip citizens to navigate and analyse information independently.
2. **The Role of the Government as Arbiter of Truth**: By positioning the government as an arbiter of truth through regulatory obligations, the bill raises concerns about the reliability and bias in determining what constitutes misinformation. Humans, including those in authority, can err. An approach that encourages open dialogue and critical thinking would be far more beneficial than one that centralises truth claims within governmental frameworks.
3. **Vagueness of Legislation**: The language within the bill appears to be broad and subject to interpretation, which raises the potential for misuse. This vagueness could lead to innocent individuals being targeted under the guise of combating misinformation. It is crucial to establish clear definitions and parameters to prevent the unjust penalisation of individuals, ensuring that the legislation serves its intended purpose without infringing on personal freedoms.
4. **Exemptions for Certain Bodies**: The proposal suggests that certain entities may be exempt from scrutiny, creating an uneven playing field. If specific bodies are allowed to operate without the same obligations imposed on digital platforms, how can the public hold them accountable for their own dissemination of misinformation? Ensuring equitable accountability across all information sources is essential for fostering trust and transparency.
In conclusion, I urge the Committee to reconsider the provisions of this bill. Instead of regulatory restrictions, prioritising educational initiatives that promote media literacy and critical thinking will empower Australians to navigate information responsibly and effectively.
Thank you for considering my views on this important matter.
Thank you for all your ongoing hard work and dedication, I am truly grateful that we have you. I hope we can all find peace one day.