The ACT Government has passed legislation to take over the Calvary Hospital, which is run by the Catholic Church and has provided healthcare to millions of Australians through their 14 hospitals around Australia.
This follows legislation in the ACT to provide free abortion on demand to anyone who is under 16 weeks pregnant. The ACT Government is also proposing legislation to allow euthanasia without “time to death”, which means anyone can ask for euthanasia at any time, even if they are not sick. That same proposal includes no age limit to deliberately allow children to be euthanised.
Calvary, through the Catholic Church, has gone on record to say they will not participate in either of these programs so the Canberra autocrats have seized the hospital so abortion and euthanasia cam occur.
When I spoke about this online the response from the left was to say “there is no place for religion in healthcare”. My response to this is simple – if you don’t want religious healthcare go to a state run hospital; if you don’t like religious aged care go to another aged care provider; and if you don’t like religion in schools go to a state school.
This is a power grab by Canberra autocrats who cannot tolerate dissenting opinion.
The Federal Government has authority over Canberra and must intervene to, at least, put this move to the people.
Transcript
As a servant to the many different people who make up our wonderful Queensland community, I support this motion from Senator Cash, Senator Canavan and fellow senators to refer the takeover of Calvary hospital to a committee inquiry. This blatant attack on religion in health care has caused trouble for ‘PAN AM’—or Canberra, as some still call it.
Legislation to seize the hospital from the Catholic Church has passed the Australian Capital Territory parliament—legislation developed over a long period of time, partly in secret. In fact, this is the second attempt ACT Health autocrats have made to force Calvary out of health care. The only God autocrats respect is the god of power—power used in pursuit of a genuinely evil agenda. The ACT has legislated abortion and euthanasia. The Catholic Church insists on putting humanity around those rules, which has inflamed ACT autocrats. Nobody is going to get in the way of the health autocrats’ agenda to murder babies and murder our elderly—and now considering murdering children and the severely handicapped. As an aside, the right to die, as we are seeing in Europe, will become an obligation to die.
There are 14 Calvary hospitals in Australia delivering health services in a faith-based environment, healing of millions of Australians since their start in 1885. Churches around Australia provides hundreds of aged-care homes. Each of these must be looking over their shoulder at what Canberra Health autocrats are trying to do at Calvary.
My public address to a pro-life rally in Rockhampton two weeks ago and a subsequent video on this topic has been met with an interesting response from the Left—the control side of politics. I will address that now. The common reply, repeated verbatim from a legion of social media bots and mindless zombies, is this: there is no place for religion in health care. It seems to me that this is a most hypocritical statement. When religious groups protested drag queens exposing themselves and reading adult sex stories to kids in libraries in ‘drag queen story time’, religious groups were told, “If you don’t like it, don’t go.” Well, let me direct your argument right back at you: if you don’t want religion in your health care, don’t go to a Christian managed hospital. While we are at it, if you don’t like religion in aged care, go to another aged-care facility and, if you don’t like religion in education, don’t send your kids to a religious school.
See how it works? It’s freedom of choice. That’s what is irking the Canberra bureaucrats—freedom. We know how much autocrats have embraced utilitarian agendas and how COVID has normalised such behaviour. Clearly, these health bureaucrats have no intention of surrendering powers obtained dishonestly. I imagine they can’t wait to tear that cross off the front of the Calvary hospital. Calvary hospitals have treated millions of Australians who are happy to be treated in a religious hospital. Federal parliament has precedence over ACT law. This matter is rightly within the Senate’s purview, and I am strongly in support of Senator Cash and Senator Canavan’s motion.
This is partly about property rights and partly about freedom of choice. Property rights are fundamental to human progress, fundamental to innovation, fundamental to freedom and fundamental to responsibility. Federal Labor, in this term of government, has nationalised the gas industry. The federal Liberal and National parties stole farmers’ property rights in the Howard-Anderson Liberal and National government. Now the ACT wants to steal churches’ property rights and nationalise religious values.
We need a Senate inquiry. The federal Constitution has powers to deal with religion.
My message to Canberra health autocrats is simple: God decides who lives and dies, not you.
Thank you for everything you said to defend our hospitals and schools and may God bless you with wisdom to continue the fight for the Australian people as a Christian. It saddens me that the church are not rising up against this anarchy from our government and that the Australian people are so sleep in what is going on. God bless you
I agree absolutely this takeover of the Catholic Hospital in Canberra is typical of what you would expect from a Communist regime, not from a free society like Australia. Unfortunately we have been asleep and allowed these Marxists to take control. Now it is time to fight back, and I mean fight. Boot these low life’s out of the Government and out of Australia as they do not belong here. They belong in North Korea or China.
Couldn’t have said it better myself Tony !
Malcolm,
The situation with Calvary Hospital (Canberra) may be more involved than the simplistic view presented here.
Your highly emotional stance and accusations of a power grab raises many concerns regarding the reliability of this report.
In essence, I feel I am forced to go to sites other than one nation for reliable information.
Have you identified all factors critically involved in the action of the ACT government?
Cheers,
Col
A quick search reveals there had been previous discussions with the owners but they had broken down hence the ACT proceeded to the take over.
Over what period of time did the discussions occur?
What topics were discussed?
What factors are responsible for this break down?
The ACT govt. plans a considerable extension of the existing hospital to increase / improve health facilities for the population.
A realistic position would be to cover these points and others that may arise.
Cheers,
Col
Col, face the facts for once. It is a blatant abuse of power driven by an ideological agenda that promotes murder at both ends of life. Stop schilling for the left.
Mick,
I am trying to determine the facts.
Please carefully read my posts above.
You will notice I suspect the situation may be more involved than indicated by Malcolm’s initial posting.
The questions asked were intended to determine this possibility.
The accusation as follows;
“Stop schilling for the left”
does not belong in a rational debate.
Cheers,
Col
Well said Mick ,lm with you mate !
Thank you
Senator Malcom Roberts
‘God decides who lives and dies, not you’.
Don’t the Calvary Hospitals have a great track record in delivering exemplary quality of care for human beings?
What would drive anyone to wish to rob the community of the opportunity to feel somewhat safe, in their time of need.
It is now fairly common that unique individuals are absolutely terrified to go to hospital… due to the dreadful militant ways they were treated and endured during the global covid debacle.
Valid point about fear in attending hospitals these days after the COVID scam ! Trust has waned and choice about which hospitals to attend should remain .
Thank you – much needed
And if they decide god doesn’t exist or doesn’t have a place in society.
My questions are yet to be answered.
Or even seriously acknowledged.
See above.
Why?
Col
Stupid questions certainly do not warrant an answer, let alone acknowledgement. Malcolm’s time is valuable and I’m sure that he has more important things to attend to. If a person cannot see the issue here which is as ‘plain as day’ or ‘as plain as the nose on your face,’ then it’s like ummm, I have no words, I just shake my head…..😶🙄
Hi Janet,
I was asking serious questions as I think there is more to the issue than presented in Malcolm’s opening statements.
Malcolm may have important issues to attend but if he has made various statements then he should be prepared to be present and answer sincere challenges to his statements.
Cheers,
Col